Respuesta :
From a sociological standpoint, objectively yes. Roe v. Wade struck down Texas legislature attempting to ban abortions and affirmed a woman’s right to have a safe and legal abortion in the United States. Before legal abortion, women were forced to turn to illegal, often dangerous methods that sometimes proved fatal if not physically damaging in the long term. Proper legislature ensured that women stayed informed, safe, and alive. Abortion is less a debate of ethics and more a personal choice made safe and officially regulated by this landmark court case.
Answer:
you should take a clear position on the rulings. For example, you might be either for or against the legality of abortion.
You should make a clear argument explaining your position. For example:
If you believe that the court made the right decision, you might mention that the ruling in Roe v. Wade was an extension of the right to privacy that the court declared in Griswold. You might also say it is simply a protection of women’s rights and personal freedom.
If you believe that the court made the wrong decision, you might note that you believe that the rulings in Griswold and Roe lack a strong constitutional foundation. You might also mention that because it is difficult to define exactly when life begins, it is better to do no harm and allow no abortions.
You should make use of the article or outside sources to back up your claims.
Explanation:
Answers will vary, but should include the following: