Respuesta :
Answer:
Dandy Goods
Explanation:
Strict liability doctrine establishes that any person or company involved in the design, manufacture or distribution of defective merchandise can be liable for any injury resulting from using the defective product. In strict liability cases, the actions that the defendants take to prevent injuries do not count, only that the injury happened due to a product's defect. In order to be liable in a strict liability case, the defendant must manufacture, sell or rent the product in a regular basis. This is why Julie is not liable, because she doesn't sell stationary bicycles on a regular basis.
Product liability refers to the liability of the defendant when the goods he produces cause any sort of harm to the user. Given the product liability suit based on strict liability, Paula may recover from:
- Dandy Goods
The strict liability aspect of product liability states that regardless of the intent of the manufacturer while producing the goods, he will be held liable if the product causes harm to a consumer.
Based on this understanding, Paula should sue Dandy Goods for manufacturing a faulty bicycle. She is the plaintiff while Dandy Goods will be the defendant.
Learn more here:
https://brainly.com/question/9371124