Answer:
The press are responsible for receiving official statements from officials and politicians, so that they may translate them to the common citizen. These journalists have been granted special status in the United states, being the only individuals who can meet public figures and address politicians about an array of topics that fit their agenda. Some journalists, like the partisan press, have a purpose in which they lean towards a biased political party. Media has revised this nature of journalism, however, towards one favoring the objective press, where facts reign supreme. This practice gives the press a love-hate relationship with politicians, since their negative actions have the same risk of being revealed as their achievements. The way in which the press can release their gathered information could be in the form of print media, or television broadcasting, with the latter being more dominant due to accessibility sparked by the digital age.
Information can reach the eyes of the public much faster when using imagery and audio, as compared to text. Today's society consist of individuals who have low attention spans and multitask during their days, so the instant gratification of hearing "reliable" information is a luxury that seldom escapes the American home. This is a factor that the United States have recognized as potentially dangerous, one that could lead to the broadcasting of slander, facade, and defamatory hate crimes to millions of households. Because printed media goes under constant review before being published, and broadcasting is often live, heavy regulation is geared towards television to prevent the spread of falsified information. These efforts to regulate have created a complex dynamic between the press, politicians, and the public, in which the lines of truth blur as technology advances.
