Respuesta :
Answer:
Michaels wins in court.
Explanation:
Interestingly, in this case John Torniero was employed by Michaels Jewelries. Later John stole Jewelries from Michael and sold to G&W Watch and Jewelries Cooperation. Later Michaels founds out and tries to recover his Jewelries from G&W.
However, G&W claimed title to the jewelry as a good faith purchaser for value, which led to the lawsuit by Michaels.
Remember, in business law there is a provision for a buyer to claim title to a good he bought in good faith (with sincerity) from a seller who misrepresents or has voidable title.
However, in this case Michaels wins since he is the original owner (has valid title) of the goods and his title cannot be made void by G&W claims.
The Issue in this case is of the recovery of stolen goods by the orginal owner, the result of this case was that orginal owner won the case.
IRAC
In legal research IRAC stands for Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. The issue in the following case is of, if a buyer by mistake bought stolen good, than the orginal owner has right to recover the good or not.
Rule of Business Law suggest that any good purchased in good faith and sincerity becomes valid in the eyes of law. However, the orginal owner is the sole propreitor of the good even after it is stolen and sold.
Hence, the Michael Jeweller will win the case because he was the sole and orginial owner of the jewellery stolen from him and which was sold to RM Jewellery.
Learn more about Business law here:
https://brainly.com/question/6280110
