kaylahiyasni
contestada

When a reader examines Utopia and then gives an opinion about it, the reader is

A) critiquing the text.
B) paraphrasing the text.
C) providing context for the text.
D) developing anecdotes for the text.

Respuesta :

agustinarivas

Answer: When a reader examines Utopia and then gives an opinion about it, the reader is A) critiquing the text.

Explanation: To critique a text is to evaluate it, analyze it and form a judgement of it. In other words, critiquing a text is giving an opinion about it after reading it. For that reason, option A) is the correct option. In contrast, paraphrasing (B.) is expressing what a text says using your own words; therefore, it does not involve communicating an opinion about that text. Moreover, option C) makes reference to providing context, that is to say providing information about the political, social and cultural circumstances that surround a text and option D) is related to the development of stories. Neither C) nor D) involve expressing a judgement.

A reader reading about Utopia and giving an opinion on it means that they are critiquing the text. Thus, option A is accurate.

What is critiquing the text?

Critiquing the text means the evaluation is done in deeper and great detail. The text is analyzed and personal opinions about it are given. The quality of the utopia is judged based on certain parameters.

It does not use paraphrasing as the text uses its own words, and neither provides context as no information is provided. They do not make a judgment about the text.

Therefore, option A. critiquing the text is the correct option.

Learn more about critique here:

https://brainly.com/question/13983904

#SPJ2

Otras preguntas