Respuesta :
Answer:
d. Officers told Jennifer that the man she identified in the photo array had been involved in other breaking-and-entering crimes.
Explanation:
Jennifer identifcation of the man at the initial stage he was arranged could have being filled with doubt but during the second arrangement of those people, she could have been biased in sticking to her first choice.This could be as a result of learning from the investigating officer that, the person she identified earlier has been involved in other breakings-and-entering crimes.
This information would definitely have influenced her judgement during the second parade of those people. Had it been such information was actually withheld from her, there is a great chance of her backtracking and withdrawing from her first choice and probably taking a judgement free from bias.
The Correct option is D. Officer telling Jennifer about the details of a criminal, tends to give positive feedback, which could impact identification of her assailant.
Positive Feedback
A feedback which highlights the end result of an action, so that it causes more similar kind of action to get the same end result. In this case, a person in authority gave the information to Jennifer, which made Jennifer sure that the person who attacked her was the same culprit shown in the picture.
This topic is related to the Ronald Cotton's trial. In this trial, Cotton was wrongfully convicted of crimes, which he did not commit, because of flawed eyewitness identification. So, going by the story and the trial, we can say that the correct option is D.
Learn More about Ronald Cotton's trial here:
https://brainly.com/question/24533070