Answer:
The parol evidence rule
Explanation:
Parol evidence does not allow the introduction of oral evidence that changes the meaning of a contract with the following conditions:
-It does not allow oral evidence that occurred before the written contract was done.
- It allows oral evidence after the written contract is executed.
- When oral evidence can explain the contract it is also allowed.
For example if one bought a car and the salesman said there is a discount, but the contract states that there is no discount on the sale of the car. What the salesman said beforehand is not enforceable.
Answer:
The correct answer is: The Parol Evidence Rule.
Explanation:
The Parol Evidence Rule is applied in court cases to make clear that oral agreements given to plaintiffs without any proof cannot be taken into consideration in the final decision of the case unless there is a disclosure in a written contract signed between a plaintiff and the defendant stating the opposite.
