Respuesta :
Answer:
Here we must use relevant costing for making the decision either we should continue the BBA program or we should close it down.
Now according to relevant costing principles if the cost is relevant then it must satisfy following conditions:
- Must be cash flow in nature.
- Must be Future related (no past commitments).
- Differential or must be incremental
Clearly cash would be used here and the cost or income arising must not be linked to the past bindings, it must be future related. The third condition is very interesting here, the concept of differential can be grasped by the following table which I have derived by teaching students of Nottingham Trent University:
Step 1: What is the cash flow if we don't make decision?
Step 2: What is the cash flow if we make the decision?
Step 3: Take the difference of step one and two. The difference is differential or incremental cost.
Now from the above steps what we learned is that an incremental cost will arise if we take the decision (closing down BBA), and it will not arise if we don't take the decision (closing down BBA).
DEGREE INCOME STATEMENT (DIFFERENTIAL REVENUES COSTS)
FOR ACADEMIC YEAR ENDING JUNE30
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
Make Decision If we Don't Differential
Revenue loss (6,000,000) - (6,000,000)
Direct Costs Savings
Advertising BBA Program - 225,000 225,000
Faculty Salaries - 3,060,000 3,060,000
Degree Operating Costs - 390,000 390,000
Building maintenance - 555,000 555,000
Classroom Costs W1 - - -
All. administration costs W2 645,000 645,000 -
TOTAL COSTS (1,770,000)
We can see that there is no benefit arising by making this decision. The decrease in contribution is by $1,770,000. As there is no benefits arising, so closing down BBA program is not in cards.
Explanation:
Working 1 (W1): The classroom cost is basically depreciation and depreciation is a non cash flow item so it does not satisfies the conditions of being relevant cost.
Working 2 (W2): General overheads like in this case we have Allocated school administration cost, is not relevant here because, it is past binding and is also not differential or incremental. It must not be included in the computation, however I had included it because I think you must understand why it is not differential.