Answer:
- reviewable for abuse of discretion.
- facts are reviewable for clear error.
-reviewable De novo on question of law
Explanation:
The standard of finding of facts and factual is derived from federal law of civil procedures that states that a court of appeal May not set aside facts or findings except found erroneous.
Conclusion of laws are subjected to de novo review by appellate court, meaning when a court reviews a case, it gives no weight to the trial court conclusion because the appellate court are changed with correcting legal errors and developing laws.
