Answer:
D). Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is demonstrated as the technique that involves examples or evidence to supplement the credibility of the conclusion. It exemplifies a logical approach offering broad conclusions from specified illustrations or observations contrary to the deductive reasoning that involves a series of statements to come to a conclusion. The conclusion in inductive reasoning could vary from the premises contrary to the certain conclusions in deductive reasoning. Thus, option D is the answer as inductive reasoning involves the conclusions based on specific examples.
