The original idea of schools which do not believe is yet abandoned as worthless or out of date was that children had not yet reached the point of experience and wisdom which enabled them to teach all their elders.... But one may, I hope, be permitted to harbor the thought that taxpayers send children to school on the premise that, at their when, they need to learn, not teach what is the reasoning in this argument?

Respuesta :

im honestly not sure i wish i could be more help

Answer:

That children are sent to school to learn, not to teach, so the students in this case were in the wrong by trying to "teach" others something by wearing armbands

Explanation: