Respuesta :

Answer:

The Scopes Trial, formally known as The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes and regularly alluded to as the Scopes Monkey Trial, was an American legitimate case in July 1925 in which a substitute secondary teacher, John T. Extensions, was blamed for abusing Tennessee's Butler Act.  

The Fundamentalist– Modernist contention is a noteworthy break that started during the 1920s and '30s inside the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America. At issue were fundamental debate about the job of Christianity, the specialist of Scripture, the passing, Resurrection, and making up penance of Jesus.  

The Scopes-Monkey Trial was a broadly advanced conflict among fundamentalists and innovators. Fundamentalists passed laws in schools that rendered the instructing of advancement illicit. A pioneer - John Scopes- - overstepped this profoundly fundamentalist law and instructed development to his understudies. For this he was arraigned. In spite of the fact that the preliminary was a fundamentalist triumph - Scopes was discovered liable - innovators would at present battle for their entitlement to show development and science as opposed to religion-based creation legends.

The Scopes Trial, was an American true case in July 1925 in which a substitute secondary teacher, John T. Extensions, was faulted for abusing Tennessee's Butler Act.  

What is modernism and the fundamentalism?

The fundamentalists are one who take a firm stand upon the timeless validity of each doctrine of Christian orthodoxy, and

Modernists are one who advocated a witting adaptation of religion in response to the new scientific finds and the moral pressures of the age.

Here, Fundamentalism expresses authority and fixed doctrines in religion, whereas modernism underlines freedom and progress in religious idea.

The Scopes-Monkey Trial was a generally advanced battle among fundamentalists and innovators because that Fundamentalists traveled laws in schools that generated the teaching of advancement outlaw.

A pioneer exceeded this deeply fundamentalist law and taught development to his role player. For this he was criminated. In spite of the fact that the prelim was a fundamentalist triumph.

Therefore, the trial illustrated the conflict between the modernism and fundamentalism.

Learn more about scopes trial, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/3434522