Respuesta :
this might help you.
In William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, there is a major difference between two of the characters, Brutus and Mark Antony. Brutus was very honorable and Antony was very persuasive. When Brutus spoke at Caesar’s funeral, he appealed to the people’s logic and Antony spoke to the emotions of the people. Antony is very smart and uses his brain frequently during the play and Brutus is very naive about many of things. Brutus was very honorable and Antony was very persuasive. Brutus was very honorable in the way that he always told people the truth. Antony was persuasive in the way that he used people to get whatever he wanted. For example, Antony used Lepidus to seek revenge on all of the conspirators to take the blame for their deaths. In the speech at Caesar’s funeral Brutus spoke to the people’s logical mind and Antony spoke to the emotions of the people. Brutus’ speech was very short and to the point and spoke to the logic of the people in the crowd. For example, Brutus spoke in a detached way about Caesar’s death while Antony spoke to the emotions of the crowd by crying and talking about all the good things that Caesar did for Rome. Antony’s intelligence was very apparent throughout the play and Brutus appeared to be naive about many things. Antony is smart in the way that he manipulates people to his own advantage. For example, Antony was manipulative in his emotional approach to persuade people to become outraged at Brutus. Brutus appears to be naive throughout the whole play because he believed everyone was as honorable as he. Brutus did not question what he was told, assuming it was always true. In conclusion, in William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, there is a major difference between the two characters, Brutus and Mark Antony. The strongest contrast between the two characters appears to be their ability and inability to be both honorable and persuasive.
i hope i helped you!
In William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, there is a major difference between two of the characters, Brutus and Mark Antony. Brutus was very honorable and Antony was very persuasive. When Brutus spoke at Caesar’s funeral, he appealed to the people’s logic and Antony spoke to the emotions of the people. Antony is very smart and uses his brain frequently during the play and Brutus is very naive about many of things. Brutus was very honorable and Antony was very persuasive. Brutus was very honorable in the way that he always told people the truth. Antony was persuasive in the way that he used people to get whatever he wanted. For example, Antony used Lepidus to seek revenge on all of the conspirators to take the blame for their deaths. In the speech at Caesar’s funeral Brutus spoke to the people’s logical mind and Antony spoke to the emotions of the people. Brutus’ speech was very short and to the point and spoke to the logic of the people in the crowd. For example, Brutus spoke in a detached way about Caesar’s death while Antony spoke to the emotions of the crowd by crying and talking about all the good things that Caesar did for Rome. Antony’s intelligence was very apparent throughout the play and Brutus appeared to be naive about many things. Antony is smart in the way that he manipulates people to his own advantage. For example, Antony was manipulative in his emotional approach to persuade people to become outraged at Brutus. Brutus appears to be naive throughout the whole play because he believed everyone was as honorable as he. Brutus did not question what he was told, assuming it was always true. In conclusion, in William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, there is a major difference between the two characters, Brutus and Mark Antony. The strongest contrast between the two characters appears to be their ability and inability to be both honorable and persuasive.
i hope i helped you!
Two characters, Brutus and Mark Antony have a significant contrast in William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar. Both Antony and Brutus were highly honorable and convincing. At Caesar's burial, Brutus appealed to the audience's reason, while Antony addressed their feelings. Throughout the play, Antony constantly employs his intellect, whereas Brutus exhibits a great deal of naivete. Both Antony and Brutus were highly honorable and convincing. In that he always told people the truth, Brutus was highly honorable. Antony was seductive in the manner he used others to achieve his goals. As an illustration, Antony used Lepidus to exact retribution on all the conspirators and claim responsibility for their demise. In their speeches at Caesar's burial, Brutus and Antony addressed the audience's intellect and emotions, respectively. Brutus' speech was brief, to the point, and appealed to the crowd's sense of reason. For instance, while Antony sobbed and talked about all that Caesar had accomplished for Rome, Brutus spoke about Caesar's death in a detached manner. Throughout the play, Antony's brilliance was extremely clear, and Brutus frequently came across as naïve. Antony is clever in the way he uses people to his advantage. For instance, Antony used emotional manipulation to stoke people's indignation toward Brutus. Because he thought everyone was as honorable as him, Brutus comes across as naïve throughout the entire play. Brutus took what he was told at face value and never questioned it. The two characters, Brutus and Mark Antony, in William Shakespeare's drama Julius Caesar, differ significantly from one another. The ability and inability of the two characters to be both honorable and convincing appear to be their biggest point of contrast.
Who were Brutus and Mark Antony in the play Julius Caesar?
Two characters, Brutus and Mark Antony have a significant contrast in William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar. Both Antony and Brutus were highly honorable and convincing. At Caesar's burial, Brutus appealed to the audience's reason, while Antony addressed their feelings.
To know more about Julius Caesar refer to :
https://brainly.com/question/20374702
#SPJ2
