Respuesta :

Here it is:


Personally, I think that using controlled fires to protect wild areas is a bad idea. First of all, I don't think there is a thing as a raging, huge CONTROLLED fire. Just one slip up something could go wrong. I don't think it's worth it. There are other ways to protect wild areas, and burning it down is not one of them. Secondly, it releases a lot of carbon dioxide. That is not good for the atmosphere. We want breathable air, not smoke and carbon dioxide. Lastly, you could kill a lot of wildlife. Burning down the area to save the area will not help. I do not think it is worth it.



Best of luck,

[tex] \boxed{\boxed{- \ The \ Artemis \ Wolf \ -}} [/tex]

taylor3108

Answer:

Controlled burns are also used to prevent forest fires. Even before human involvement, natural, low-intensity wildfires occurred every few years to burn up fuel, plant debris, and dead trees, making way for young, healthy trees and vegetation to thrive. That new growth in turn supports forest wildlife. Forest managers are now replicating this natural strategy when appropriate, starting manageable, slow-burning fires to make room for new life that will help keep the forest healthy in the long term.

Explanation:

Otras preguntas