contestada

The defendant is the owner of a company that is engaged in the manufacture and sale of a variety of pet supplies. The defendant's company manufactures such products as pet furniture, toys, beds, collars, leashes, cages, vitamins, etc. These items are distributed to pet stores throughout the United States and Europe. For the past ten years, the company has conducted its operations from a large factory located on the outskirts of town. One of the defendant's biggest selling products is specially manufactured high frequency dog-calling whistles. These whistles are sold to dog-training schools and kennel divisions of many police departments. Although these whistles are not audible to people, they are audible to dogs over considerable distances. Recently, the plaintiff purchased an undeveloped lot near the defendant's factory. On her property, the plaintiff constructed a pet hotel, which was used as a boarding kennel for dogs and cats. This boarding facility was situated about 100 yards from the defendant's factory. Unbeknownst to the plaintiff, high-frequency sound waves often emitted from the defendant's factory when dog-calling whistles were being tested. These sound waves caused the plaintiff's dogs to howl uncontrollably for many hours during the day and seriously interfered with the operation of her business. The plaintiff now brings an action against the defendant and the defendant's company to recover damages for the interference with her business caused by the high-frequency sound that reaches her kennel, under a theory of private nuisance. Judgment for whom?