The review by Ellison and Boyd (2013) reveals that social media research is still grappling with whether literacy is a set of skills that are Answer autonomous or a set of practices that are situated in particular contexts. The authors argue for a position between these extremes. They say that many skills do depend on the Answer literacy of the particular platform. However, literate social media users also have a certain amount of Answer that guides the way we participate, regardless of the platform. They describe the skills as Answer context-dependent and the metaknowledge as Answer similar . Being literate requires both. Once we understand this, see how complex social media literacy is. While many practices such as scrolling and sharing may seem Answer similar across different platforms, the platform-specific context (for example, Answer techno ethics that help to regulate disinformation) can be quite influential. At the current time, it is essential to take this Answer of social media literacy into account, especially as we now know that the flow of information is increasingly shaped by non-human actors or bots. We must also take into account what has been referred to as “technoethics”: addressing the challenges of mis/disinformation through greater transparency and regulation. Such an approach will require far greater Answer , and preferably more Answer involvement in the issues (in contrast to research that merely describes the issues