How do the authors use historical evidence to support their claim? Select two options.

They use a secondary source to show that the British secretary of war opposed involuntary servitude.
They use a primary source to show that a song was spreading the idea of equality across the Caribbean.
They use a secondary source to show that the idea of an enslaved people’s revolt was groundbreaking.
They use a statistic to show that England had enough voters to end slavery and establish equality.
They use a primary source to show that some white people opposed the idea of freeing enslaved people.
By the end of August, the French colony was in flames. So many cane fields were on fire that the air was filled with "a rain of fire composed of burning bits of cane-straw which whirled like thick snow." Smashing mills, destroying warehouses, setting fields on fire, the freedom fighters demolished some one thousand plantations—and that was just in the first two months of their revolution. The fight against sugar and chains soon had a leader, Toussaint, who called himself “L’Ouverture”—the opening. Toussaint was making a space, an opening, for people to be free.

–Sugar Changed the World,
Marc Aronson and Marina Budhos

How do the historical details in this passage support the authors’ claim?

The text describes a revolt in detail to show that enslaved people took action against their treatment on sugar plantations.
The text illustrates the difficult conditions that L’Ouverture and other workers faced while enslaved in Saint Domingue.
The text uses primary sources to emphasize how absentee plantation owners had little control over their plantations.
The text shows that the Haitian slave revolt gave slaveholders cause to increase the number of enslaved laborers on plantations.