The author argues that the "broken window" theory is not an effective policy with respect to graffiti.
Explain whether there is relevant and sufficient evidence in the article to support this claim.
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
The claim is not fully supported because the article does not consider the negative effects of graffiti.
The claim is fully supported because the article provides details on the amount spent for cleanup in the
U.K.
The claim is not fully supported because the article does not discuss more serious crimes going on in
the U.K.
The claim is fully supported because the article explains how some graffiti artists become very famous.